Sixty Years of American Support for Israel: Costs and Benefits

Farspress send me some questions occasioned by the sixtieth anniversary of the state of Israel. Here are my answers.

Q. Given the damage the image of the West has suffered in the Muslim world by its support of Israel, what are the West’s achievements ?

A. While few Muslims would agree that the achievements are worth the costs, the main successes achieved by recent Western intervention into Middle East affairs are the end of Serbian atrocities against the Muslims and Croats, the restoration of relations with Libya and the removal of Saddam Hussein and the Taliban from power. However, the first two could have been achieved without support for Israel and the relations were bad with Libya mainly because of America’s support for Israel. The removal of Saddam was primarily motivated by concerns about his threat to Israel’s security by Richard Perle and his comrades and America’s attack on the Taliban after years of ignoring their excesses was triggered by the 9-11 attacks for which Usama bin Ladin had posited American support of Israel as one of the three main justifications.

Q. What are the costs and benefits due to the support of Israel?

A. Beyond at least three billion dollars per year in direct aid (which does not include indirect and covert aid), the costs of American support for Israel has been high oil prices, a weak currency, bad relations with the Arab and Muslim world, the escalation of food costs (partly due to the diversion of agricultural resources in to biofuels), the erosion of civil liberties for the American people, and the loss of an enormous number of American, Arab, Israeli, and other lives. The only profit has been political support for the politicians who have put Israeli interests above those of the United States and the windfall profit the high oil prices have provided to the oil industry.

Q. What do you think of claims that Israel is the main cause of instability and insecurity in the region?

A. There are many causes of instability and insecurity in the region, and observers differ on their relative importance. However, Israel plays a contributing factor in a number of them. For example, the oppressive regimes in the Middle East often use Israel as a bogeyman to resist democratic, liberal, or Islamic reform. In the end I think one can say that Israel is the single greatest source of instability in the region.

Imad-ad-Dean Ahmad
Minaret of Freedom Institute
www.minaret.org


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

2 responses to “Sixty Years of American Support for Israel: Costs and Benefits”

  1. mark hope Avatar
    mark hope

    Israel is living evil. They dance on top of building in NY when WTC destroyed by terrorist because that tragedy will force USA to attack Iraq causing 4500 American soldiers to be killed. IN FACT I THINK ISRAEL IS BEHIND WTC TRAGEDY, BECAUSE ONLY THEM WHO GET BENEFIT FROM THE WTC ATTACK. MAYBE NOW BENJAMIN NETANYAHU IS HAVING A DINNER WITH OSAMA BIN LADEN. WE, AMERICAN ARE BEING FOOLED BY ISRAEL, WE MUST WAKE UP FROM THIS NIGHTMARE AND START FIGHT ISRAEL. THEY ARE THE WORLD’S BIGGEST MENACE.

  2. Imran Avatar
    Imran

    Believing in the value of free speech, MFI advocates a very open policy towards all comments posted on our blog. Comments that are not excessively annoying, characterized as flaming personal attacks, lying or accusing others of lying, meet our criteria for approval. While this comment adheres to this very minimal standard, it is filled with misinformation and false accusations. Although the political recourse stemming from the 9/11 ultimately benefited Israel, they were not behind the attacks. Nothing about the 9/11 attacks forced the United States to attack Iraq, that action was initiated by a opportunistic Bush administration with a clear agenda. Although Israel’s uncompromising stance has continued to stall peace negotiations in the Middle East, they are not exclusively to blame. Inflammatory comments such as this only serve to further deteriorate relations and promote hostility. The “fight” against Israel that will achieve success must be characterized by compromise, concessions, and recognition of previous mistakes from both sides.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

RSS
Follow by Email