[When Jamil Al-Amin who had been transformed from the fiery proponent of violence into the man credited with cleaning up Atlanta’s crime-ridden West End by his conversion to Islam was arrested for “cop-killing” the Muslim community was stunned and suspicious of a frame-up. Recent shocking developments in the handling of his incarceration outlined by human rights activist Mauri Saalakhan below suggest that we must continue to press for the truth in this matter to emerge.]
Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin: An Update
On Thursday, August 2, 2007, the public learned that Jamil Al-Amin, formerly known as H. Rap Brown, no longer was in the custody of the State of Georgia; he had been moved, without notification to his attorneys or family members, from the Georgia State Prison at Reidsville, Georgia into the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Information provided to the press indicated that Mr. Al-Amin was moved to Oklahoma City and then within a day to the ADMAX federal prison in Florence, Colorado. It was only on August 15, 2007 that he was able to inform his attorneys that he was moved from Reidsville State Prison to the Atlanta Medical Center, in Atlanta, for two days of exploratory tests for chest pains. He then was moved to Georgia’s Jackson State Prison before Georgia handed him over to the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Once in federal custody, Mr. Al-Amin was moved to Oklahoma City and then moved to his final destination—the “Supermax†federal prison in Florence, Colorado, to be held in 23-hour lockdown.
Mr. Al-Amin has three legal actions pending. The transfer to federal custody in a facility over 1,400 miles away removes him from the Georgia area where family and friends would be able to visit on a regular basis. The move continues to isolate him from other inmates and the opportunity to worship with others, and it further imposes harsh conditions which Mr. Al-Amin challenged while incarcerated in the Georgia prison system.
Attorneys questioned the Georgia Department of Corrections as to the reason for Mr. Al-Amin’s transfer to federal custody, even though he has not been charged or convicted of a federal crime. Devon Orland, Department of Law, State of Georgia, responded:“The decision to transfer Mr. Al-Amin was made in conjunction with the federal government and was based upon legitimate security concerns. As for the specific events that led to his transfer I am not at liberty to discuss those but can tell you that there were legitimate security concerns. Neither I, nor anyone with the Department of Corrections has control over where Mr. Al-Amin will be housed within the federal system. He will be subject to the same rules for transfer as any other prisoner within that system and you will need to check with them as to his current status, likelihood of his being housed within Georgia and rules regarding attorney contact and legal mail. Mr. Al-Amin is in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons but is under a State of Georgia prison sentence so “responsibility†is hard to define out of context. The Bureau of Prisons is responsible for the care and incarceration of Mr. Al-Amin if that is the question you are asking…â€
Pending Litigation
Habeas Corpus: Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin v. Hugh Smith. On November 14, 2005, counsel for Mr. Al-Amin filed a Habeas Corpus in the Superior Court of Tattnall County, State of Georgia. The habeas corpus action cited 14 grounds for reversal of Mr. Al-Amin’s conviction and sentence of life without parole. Grounds presented included ineffective assistance of counsel based on the failure of trial counsel to: request a change of venue due to negative publicity; permit Mr. Al-Amin to testify in his own defense; investigate the confession of an individual; challenge the issue of the prosecution striking all persons from the jury who indicated an affiliation to Muslims; failure of the prosecution to provide discovery to the defense; inappropriate statements made by the prosecution regarding the failure of Mr. Al-Amin to testify, and his courtroom conduct by not standing for the jury as members entered the courtroom. Other grounds included error on the part of the judge by denying Mr. Al-Amin the right to counsel of his choice by eliminating all but one of his four trial lawyers from participating in voir dire of the jury; the opportunity to present favorable evidence and testimony; and the opportunity to raise prior misconduct of an FBI agent.
The habeas also challenges the government sponsored oath taken by the grand and petit jurors and witnesses which resulted in a conflict between religious practices and state function in violation of the Establishment Clause and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Counsel also addressed the issue of violation of the 6th and 14th Amendments based on jury selection procedures. Attorneys and investigators worked during 2006 to identify witnesses and obtain documents to present during a scheduled February 27, 2007 habeas hearing.  The hearing was held and attorneys currently continue to take depositions and to supplement the habeas brief before the judge assigned to the case renders a decision. The attorneys received the habeas hearing transcript and trial record free of charge after the judge approved pauper status requested by Mr. Al-Amin. After depositions are taken and presented to the Court, the judge is expected to make a decision whether Mr. Al-Amin is entitled to a new trial based on evidence presented.
From a cell at the Florence, Colorado ADMAX federal prison, Mr. Al-Amin continues to challenge the State of Georgia’s prison system through the filing of two § 1983 actions.
Opening Legal Mail: Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin v. Hugh Smith and Sanchez-Martin: This action was filed to challenge the warden and staff of the Georgia State Prison at Reidsville for opening legal mail outside of Mr. Al-Amin’s presence sent from Attorney Karima Al-Amin. In November 2004, the Department of Corrections ruled that Reidsville violated standard operating procedures by opening mail clearly marked “legal†from Mr. Al-Amin’s wife who is an attorney licensed to practice law in Georgia. Opening legal mail outside of an inmate’s presence is a First Amendment violation as well as a violation of the attorney-client privilege. The District Court ruled that Georgia continued to open Mr. Al-Amin’s legal mail from Attorney Karima Al-Amin in violation of its standard operating procedures. The State of Georgia appealed the decision to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, and the Court appointed counsel from the law firm of Kilpatrick Stockton, LLP, to argue Mr. Al-Amin’s case. Argument was held on September 20, 2007 resulting in the 11th Circuit ruling, on January 7, 2008, that the Reidsville warden and staff violated Mr. Al-Amin’s First Amendment rights by opening legal mail from Attorney Karima Al-Amin outside of his presence. The State appealed to the 11th Circuit for a rehearing, and the Court denied the appeal. The State subsequently filed its writ to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was denied on October 6, 2008. The pro bono attorneys from Kilpatrick Stockton are preparing for trial and will explore challenging the Prison Litigation Reform Act, which prevents Mr. Al-Amin from receiving punitive damages. Attorneys further are exploring filing a separate action challenging Reidsville’s effort to infringe on Mr. Al-Amin’s right to practice his religion while incarcerated. This action would be a RLUIPA claim.
Retaliation Lawsuit: This action addressed Reidsville’s past 23-hour lockdown confinement of Mr. Al-Amin, retaliatory actions, and the transfer to the ADMAX federal prison in Florence, Colorado. The State of Georgia transferred Mr. Al-Amin based on a March 1990 Agreement between the Georgia Department of Corrections and the Federal Bureau of Prisons to house a state inmate upon request.
This transfer more than 1,400 miles from his legal counsel at a time when lawsuits are pending in Georgia took place without notification to Mr. Al-Amin’s attorneys or family members, even though his habeas and lawsuits were pending. The retaliation lawsuit also addressed efforts to prevent Mr. Al-Amin from freely exercising his right to practice his religion in the Georgia prison system. A new retaliation lawsuit will be filed now that all administrative remedies have been exhausted. The new legal action will present the same challenges as the previous retaliation lawsuit.
Although the Federal Bureau of Prisons maintains it will return Mr. Al-Amin to Georgia upon Georgia’s request, Georgia is refusing to seek his return. We see the transfer out of the State of Georgia to a federal institution that operates a behavior modification program is seen as a punitive action on the part of the government and welcome assistance to petition for a change to a neighboring federal facility or Georgia prison, and out of the SUPERMAX conditions.
El-Hajj Mauri’ Saalakhan
Director of Operations
The Peace And Justice Foundation
Leave a Reply